Re: Effective difference between git-rebase and git-resolve

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marc Singer <elf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> 	git merge "Merge with Linus" work linus
>> 
>> instead, which will use the proper "recursive" merge functionality.
>
> OK.  I'll see if that is more successful.  It would be nice if the
> resolve command printed a message about the command being deprecated.

The only reason I didn't do that was because I just did not want
to disrupt the workflow by Linus.  If nobody in the upper
echelon of kernel people (meaning, longest-time git users) use
git-resolve anymore, I think we should mark it deprecated and
remove it eventually.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]