On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-22 17:28:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > This one-liner to cvsps.c seems to make sure we have an ancestor branch > > > for that "gdb-4.18-branch" branch, at least according to the cvsps output. > > > > The "git cvsimport" is still running, but at least it seems to be happily > > running further past the point it broke earlier. > > I've started it once again, too, with the one-liner added to Debian > unstable's version of cvsps: > > It seems there's a patch like > http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0602/16278.html is missing? > ...or we need a better cvsps. Shall I add it and try again / try to > continue, or give up on it for now? Though it would be nice to have > these two large and important source trees under GIT control :-) You make want to try the cvsps patch I attached to the email here: http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/11812.html Good luck! -chris - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html