Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> (i) I _think_ that it would be less of a surprise if a branch would be
> checked first.

Yeah, I guess that's true.

> Actually, I'm almost inclined to suggest making Git fail violently in
> case of an ambiguous name.

Maybe not fail, but at least warn very loudly.

		Linus
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]