Re: seperate commits for objects already updated in index?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I also think that test is historical, from before Junio cleaned up how 
> "git commit" worked - it _used_ to be that "git commit" would work in the 
> current index, but these days it generates a new index to commit when you 
> do "-o", so there's really no _technical_ reason to refuse the partial 
> commit any more as far as I can see.
>
> So I don't know. I don't think you were being dumb, I think git could have 
> been friendlier to you.

I have to go back to the list archive, but if I recall correctly
the refusal was added to be friendlier -- by being safer -- and
was not there in the earlier round of -o/-i proposal.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]