Re: What should I use instead of git show?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:33:22AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Why not just use "git show"?
> 
> It hasn't gone anywhere that I know of. It's still there.

Oh beautiful.

I had an old (as in 3 months max, but heh) git-tree at work in a
corner from which I had compiled git.  When I saw it didn't have git
show which I have at home I did a git pull, recompile, reinstall.

The new git didn't have git show, so I thought it had been removed
after all.  Turns out, the git pull had broken halfway due to the old
version of git.  It hadn't fast forwarded _all_ the versions.  But the
new git, while not current, has been able to do the complete git pull
this time.  And now I have git show at work too.

Guess you have to update git every month or so if you want to be able
to follow current trees.

  OG.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]