Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:53:17 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603121810140.3618@xxxxxxxxxxx>


On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> 		if (high > HASH_VAL)
> 			high -= HASH_VAL;

That should be ">= HASH_VAL", of course. I'm a retard. 

		Linus
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Fredrik Kuivinen
- Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Prev by Date: Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Trivial warning fix for imap-send.c
Previous by thread: Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
Next by thread: Re: git-diff-tree -M performance regression in 'next'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]