Your suggestion has merit, though it's different from the behaviour I desired. I _sometimes_ need the pruning, and it felt appropriate to make it an option as opposed to default behaviour. What do you think? - Martin - On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:29:18PM +0100, Alex Riesen wrote: > Martin Atukunda, Tue, Mar 07, 2006 16:16:12 +0100: > > +-p:: > > + Run `git-prune-packed` after packing, see > > + gitlink:git-prune-packed[1] > > + > > Maybe just make "-d" work? I.e. "git repack -a -d" repacks and prunes > everything, and "git repack -d" prunes just what was packed > incrementally. > Something like this: > > diff --git a/git-repack.sh b/git-repack.sh > index 3d6fec1..be6c7ab 100755 > --- a/git-repack.sh > +++ b/git-repack.sh > @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ then > esac > done > ) > + else > + git-prune-packed > fi > fi > > > - > : send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Girl on cell: Can you hear me when I roll my eyes? -- www.overheardinnewyourk.com - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html