Re: [RFH] zlib gurus out there?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> 
>> However, I am stuck with the first step, which is to do a full
>> flush after the header.  An obvious change to the code quoted
>> above writes out a corrupt object:
>> 
>> 	/* First header.. */
>> 	stream.next_in = hdr;
>> 	stream.avail_in = hdrlen;
>> -	while (deflate(&stream, 0) == Z_OK)
>> +	while (deflate(&stream, Z_FULL_FLUSH) == Z_OK)
>> 		/* nothing */;
>
> No, I don't think that's good. You're only doing a partial deflate, you 
> can't ask for a Z_FULL_FLUSH. That only works if you give it the whole 
> buffer, and you don't.

So, in short there is no way to create:

    hdr part deflated.
    flush.
    data part deflated independently.

and have the current sha1_read_file() not to notice that flush,
while I can inspect the deflated stream to find the "flush", and
copy only the defalted data part into a pack?  Bummer...  I was
really shooting for full backward compatibility.



-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]