Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Anyway, apart from that issue (which I think should be trivial to sort out > if we accept breaking --merge-order), the rest looks like it should just > get more testing and handling of the few missing flags from rev-parse in > revision.c, and it should be good. I would say we should just rip merge-order out. Who uses it, and why does it not work with topo-order, again? - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html