Re: [PATCH] First cut at libifying revlist generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes gets a test-pilot star for this.  This also means we need a bit 
> better set of tests.

Well, I don't deserve this. I cheated.

In my personal version of git, there are a few subtle things different 
than in the official version. Most of them, I sent out already, and they 
were rejected, such as 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/10718, which 
helped me tremendously in identyfing the bug.

But there is also a test case in my version, which was a failure, 
originally. I wrote it to demonstrate that the stupid version of 
git-fetch was stupid. It did not demonstrate that, but rather quite a bit 
of (my) normal usage. That is the reason it takes a really long time for a 
test case, and that in turn is the reason I did not dare to submit it.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]