Re: [PATCH] First cut at libifying revlist generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> Not really, because the second invocation of add_one_commit()
> says "I've seen that *commit*", which is correct.  And the story
> is obviously the same if you used longhand "^v1.0.0^0 v1.0.0".

Ok.

I suspect that the simplest fix is to just move "limited" into the "revs" 
structure, the way I did pretty much everything else. That way nothing 
really changes: we'll have the exact same logic, the flag just moved 
around.

		Linus
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]