On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:23:24AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > I'm just a lowly user, but I see people trying to export git > > trees to other SCMs, and they seem to prefer merge-order. > > This is your chance to correct me about: > > (a) how I am wrong; (b) how they are wrong. 8;) > > Well, I didn't even realize anybody at all was using it. I've never seen > any mention of it, and considering how ungodly slow it is, I would have > expected somebody to pipe up about it.. > > I did a google search for "git" and "merge-order", and the only actual use > (as opposed to mention in a man-page) I found in the 20 hits google showed > was an old version of gitk. http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/12965.html But topo-order would probably work as well, the default ordering just didn't work correctly in my tests. Certainly not a case that votes *against* removal, just noting an actual user at one point. -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html