Re: [PATCH] nicer eye candies for pack-objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:


I like this, but like the "every second or every percent
whichever comes first" unpack-objects does even better.  How
about something like this on top of your patch?


Well... my concern is (if I'm right) that this status is generated remotely and sent over the network when performing a fetch. The "every percent" might in this case generate quite some significant overhead if the pack is small.


But if the pack is small it won't matter. It's when it's big we want to know about it (and then the each-percent method is better, really).

Also (personal opinion) such progress numbers are harder to read when they change too fast.


I don't know about the rest of the world, but when I see numbers counting up with a percent-sign behind them I do some mental math to see how many brain-ticks go between each increment and then multiply with 100 to see if I need to get a beer while waiting. I don't really care what number it shows if it flashes too fast to read.

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]