Re: Doing without pygtk ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:18:26PM +0100, Ken Moffat via gimp-developer-list wrote:
> Everyone knows that python2 is reaching end of life, but until now
> pygtk-2 (which seems to be unmaintained) has continued to build.
> But now pango is under more-active maintenance, and using harfbuzz
> (which is a good thing).  Unfortunately, as part of the changes in
> pango-1.44 to move to hb, a _lot_ of things from pango headers have
> moved into private headers which do not get installed.
> 
> At the risk of offending people who want to use python2 with gimp:
> is it practical to build gimp-2.10 without pygtk-2 ?
> 

Builds fine with --disable-python.  Whether all users will find it
usable is a different matter ;-)

ĸen
-- 
One pill makes you larger, And one pill makes you small.
And the ones that mother gives you, Don't do anything at all.
Go ask Alice, When she's ten feet tall.
               -- Jefferson Airplane, White Rabbit
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list




[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux