Hi Elle, I looked at the posts on discuss.pixls.us, and it seems that their approach is quite different to what we are trying to achieve. They are mostly trying to use multiple images or use traditional methods which don't yield very good results. Thanks, Maitraya. On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:12 PM Elle Stone <ellestone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/21/19 10:01 AM, Elle Stone wrote: > > > > I don't know if this is the same "super resolution", but FWIW the topic > > has come up several times on discuss.pixls.us: > > > > https://discuss.pixls.us/search?q=%20superresolution > > My apologies, I wasn't very clear. discuss.pixls.us is a discussion > forum for users and developers of free/libre software. > > Possibly there is already some sort of super-resolution algorithm > implementation for one or another free-libre softwares, in which case > there is also free/libre code available. But I didn't read any of the > links to see what they are actually about. > > Pat David (the person who runs the forum) might know whether there's any > actual implementation with code that might overlap with/be useful for > what Maitraya Bhattacharyya is proposing to do. > > -- > https://ninedegreesbelow.com > Color management and free/libre photography > _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
