>That would explain a lot. Though people do manage to compile GIMP on >Windows, it's apparently not easy to do. >Partha's 2.9/2.10 builds for Windows have been available for a long time >(https://www.partha.com/), without giving rise to nearly so many bug >reports as the official release of 2.10. But maybe most Windows users >don't know about Partha's builds. The problem with Partha's builds is that he changes things to suit himself and therefore it's not a reliable reference for creating bug-reports against. A case in point is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795855 which apparently Partha's build isn't suffering from: https://www.gimp-forum.net/Thread-opening-from-and-saving-to-local-folders?pid=8074#pid8074 _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
