Hi! On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Kristian Rietveld <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 27 Mar 2018, at 03:25, Jehan Pagès <jehan.marmottard@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > But right now, we are discussing paying to distribute a version of GIMP > > which is barely kept alive. This is a bit doing things in the wrong order > > IMO. > > In fact, I think this is the main point. Even in the case we do decide to > pay for an account, we need to incorporate this into our build system. And > I consider it more important to first get regular 2.10 builds off the > ground than to produce signed binaries. > > [I am near having a script that completely automates the build and DMG > creation. I wanted to have 2.10 DMGs available already, but unfortunately > due to some family related events early this year I had to stall his work > for a while. It is my intention to pick it up again now]. > > I just wanted to add that Kris is the person who makes things happen in GIMP for macOS. As far as I am concerned, as said earlier, he is therefore the one who should call the shots regarding such macOS build questions, rather than a vote (unless he wants to decide through a vote himself) because in the end, he is the one who has to make the grunt work here (as a volunteer, I remind). Jehan > > I voted “I don’t care”, because manually enabling the binary is in my > opinion a minor nuisance to some of the other issues that need fixing. Also > I don’t need this feature myself, but if the community wants to see this > fixed I can look into it. > > > regards, > > -kris. > > -- ZeMarmot open animation film http://film.zemarmot.net Liberapay: https://liberapay.com/ZeMarmot/ Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
