On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Elle Stone <ellestone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/23/2017 10:03 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: >> This is what an adaptively increasing the OFFSET0 constant for >> significant downscaling in the sources might achieve - do note that >> what is meant by significant downscaling here is when scaling down to >> below 1% of original size - even in such scenarios nohalo will already >> be doing a good job. > > OK, that sounds less scary than the commit message! The gallery has been updated - as all the nohalo versions were through a mistake of mine a rendition of lohalo with a high OFFSET0, the difference between lohalo and nohalo is now more apparent - with the nohalo results in general being crisper than lohalo for such downsampling. Seeing the difference I am less inclined to remove lohalo - even if the smoother appearance of downscaling with lohalo can be achieved manually with nohalo by applying a sufficiently large gaussian-blur before scaling down. /pippin _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
