Hi, On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Elle Stone <ellestone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/29/2016 07:35 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: >> >> Does this command segfault: >> $ gegl ./icons/Symbolic/64/gimp-texture.png -o bla.png -- >> gegl:invert-gamma >> (on success it will create a bla.png, inverted from gimp-texture.png. >> You can delete bla.png after) > > > Yes, in my patched babl/GEGL/GIMP that command segfaults on gimp-texture.png > (which doesn't have an alpha channel), but not on gimp-frame.png (which does > have an alpha channel). Thanks! for sharing that command - it allowed me to > figure out which commit I made to my patched GEGL that introduced the > segfault. No prob. This is actually simply the command our makefiles run to invert the symbolic icons (to create the inverted symbolic). > As far as default babl/GEGL/GIMP, probably the only relevant information is > that two of the pngs that are used to generate GIMP's new themes are not > like the other pngs, which apparently is not a problem. Yeah, let's say it's maybe not clean enough and I may want to even these all out in the end. But for now I let the icon designer work more freely with the icon theme. No need to bother him too much with technical stuff all the time. :-) Also apart from the discrepancy of format, I don't think that's actually much a problem (nobody will see any usage difference). > So my apologies for > the noise on the mailing list! No problem. > Best, > Elle Jehan -- ZeMarmot open animation film http://film.zemarmot.net Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
