On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:55 PM, C R wrote: > Speaking as a digital painter (samples available upon request), I can tell > you the Pencil tool does not replace a pencil brush. In fact, the pencil > tool acts nothing like a pencil at all. :) Could re-name it the > "pixel-tool".... but it absolutely sucks at being a pencil in just about > every way it possibly could. ;) Perhaps you could list specific characteristics of a Pencil tool that would not suck? :) If the general idea is to make the Pencil tool (more) useful, pointing out existing deficiencies, then sketching a proposal would be a lot more constructive. > Your input is welcome. It's important to find a good solution that makes > GIMP easier to use. Great ideas don't come from only seasoned digital > painters, so thanks for all your input. > > So thanks again for your contribution to the conversation. > > I'm not willing to get rid of it unless we can put the functionality > somewhere else. This part of the conversation puzzles me. Elle is acknowledged contributor to GIMP as per AUTHORS, but you aren't. So how come _you_ welcome _her_ input? And who is that "we" that can put the functionality somewhere else? Am I missing a vital point here? Alex _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
