El sáb, 04-06-2016 a las 18:26 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió: > > Personally, I'm fine with a rant that has helpful bits of information > in it that could be extracted. All I can extract from your rant is > that you are annoyed so much that you post knowingly false > information. What "knowingly flase information"? > How does it help us make GIMP better? Hopefully making people involved take one step back and re-evaluate how they are addressing the target audience's needs. > > Why is it the goal of GIMP 2.10 to produce a GEGL-based version > > with > > feature parity with the current stable? > > Where did you even read this? Oh, come on! You say you never heard that? That the linear mode was a side effect from switching to GEGL, that some features like that weren't supposed to be in 2.10 as the minimum goal was producing a GEGL version of the 2.8 features, and anything else would be a plus? Iirc it was in the context of the first discussion about color management (supporting other colorspaces than just sRGB). And iirc it sounded as a pretext for kicking it to the future roadmap. I don't have a link to a ml thread or an IRC log, so you'll have to take my word. G. _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
