Just a quick note for everyone (that either didn't attend LGM or didn't hear the results of the conversation I had with Joao and Jehan)... After some back and forth we are currently considering managing our own infrastructure to host plugins/scripts. We had a chance to speak (loudly in my case) at LGM and I will ping the list again when we have fleshed out some ideas a little further and start soliciting some feedback/ideas. pat On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:13 PM Jason van Gumster <fweeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Akkana Peck <akkana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm still not clear what the advantage would be of one repo per > > file. > > Not to kick a week-old hornet's nest, but I'd like to point out that as a > user > looking for extensions/add-ons/scripts/etc, I find it much more convenient > to > download/clone a single script without being required to pull down a bunch > of > unrelated scripts as part of the same repository. This is even more the > case if > I happen to want to contribute code to that script. > > Granted, perhaps there's a frontend that's developed which obfuscates or > otherwise diminishes the need to get all of the undesired scripts. But > despite > the hassle (I have a few one-off scripts/add-ons for Blender on GitHub in > their > own repos), there are definitely some advantages for the people who aren't > the > primary developers. > > -Jason > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > List membership: > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list > -- Pat David https://pixls.us http://blog.patdavid.net _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
