On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM Chris Mohler <cr33dog@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Derailer here - asking for a webfont to be loaded is no less or more > secure than asking for an image to be loaded. In other words, simply > loading any web page is probably going to require loading external > resources to render properly - requesting a web font doesn't install > it in your system directory or anything. It's just a one-time deal on > page load, just like an image. > These are my thoughts as well, but still we design for the least capability first... :) > > Performance is an issue though. I'm a bit appalled that 4 or 5 seconds > for "above the fold" seems to be OK. But I'm a late intro to this > discussion, so maybe I'm off base. > 4-5 seconds for above the fold content is _not_ ok. It's also _not_ normal. The example I used above was under load, throttled to a 1mbit/s connection. We're under heavy load these past few days, so don't judge the page performance right now. After some slight abatement recently I was seeing 1-2 seconds for atf content, and 3-4 seconds for complete page load. ymmv, but we haven't even started optimizing things yet. Soon! _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
