Re: Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where binaries are licensed as
company that is distributing binaries seems fit.But source is available
that other users can make binaries if they use their own bending (CentOS,
Fedora).
Not to mention forks like LibreOffice from OpenOffice etc. or example of
Java under GPL, that have Oracle-distributed binaries but also OpenJDK.
It is just important that branding is not the same, binraires are
distributed as distributor seems fit.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Michael Schumacher <schumaml@xxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>
> On 09/18/2015 11:52 AM, Nikolam wrote:
> > On 9/17/15, srikanth <srikanth-kavarthapu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank You very Much for the information.
> >
> > Of course GPL license is about source code and Binaries can have
> > another license,
>
> No.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Michael
> GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> List membership:
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
>
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list



[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux