> > I'm just arguing against adding checkboxes arbitrarily just in case the > user wants to do anything. That's bad UI design. > I'm trying to discuss the costs and benefits of adding that complexity. > Isn't this achievable with different tools and methods? Is it needed so > frequently that is reasonable to add an extra checkbox to every single > operation? > Nobody answers that. > > I'd say "no", personally. But then again, I think there are lots of ways to handle this without cluttering the UI further. I think everyone can have what they want, but we need to think over the UI proposal a bit more. As the proposal stands, I'd have to agree with Gez and others to say that it's just too much extra. I want what Elle wants, though, in terms of functionality and I think we could brainstorm a cleaner/better solution while the devs finish with 2.9 Thoughts? > > > > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > List membership: > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
