On 17 March 2015 at 18:13, Alexandre Prokoudine < alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Joseph Bupe wrote: > > The Cage transform tool should transform only once with an aggregate > > transformation. It would make the workflow a breeze than in it's current > > form. > > Joseph, you are basically suggesting to make the tool less interactive > to make it more responsive. The real solution is to just make it more > responsive without losing interactivity :) When this will be done is > an entirely different question. We know what needs to be done, but > code contributions are required to make that happen. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > List membership: > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list > First, I do not understand which part of my suggestion will be making the tool less interactive. All I am suggesting is to improve it so that it works as good as in the bounded beharmonic weights demo here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9fqm8vgdB8 . I believe our tool was designed work like bounded beharmonic weights cage tool. Please, correct me if I am wrong. Secondly, If really "we know what needs to be done" and supposing you meant in relation to the cage transform tool, isn't it reasonable to request the author - Michael Muré for further refinement, considering the erraticness of code contributors? Joseph _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
