On 03/08/2015 03:10 PM, Ofnuts wrote: > I wondered about that at the time, but the Path technique has several > advantages over the sample points: > * you are not limited to 4 points You are not limited to 4 sample points. > * you can keep points and target layer in synch using the links If this is the goal. Keeping them fixed in relation to the image might be a different goal. > * you have sub-pixel accuracy If this is so desired, then it is an advantage for paths. Neither paths nor sample points are what you really want it you need markers in an image, though - the numbering would be really nice, fixing them to either the image, a layer, a path would be useful as well. In that regard, the ingenuity of script writers to use paths for that sort of input plays out as a disadvantage for GIMP, because otherwise someone might have implemented such markers already. -- Regards, Michael GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
