On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 18:57 +0100, scl wrote: > > With Peter's departure I don't really have a suggestion how to deal > > with this kind of a situation. It's great that people contribute code, > > and I'm thankful to them. But do we want to pile underdesigned > >features up again? Personally, I wouldn't like to see the project to > > go back to pre-2006. > > +1 > Somebody came up with code and it looked cool, therefore it's in the > code base. Like Tito and similar to the N-Point-Transformation > tool while we have the Cage tool plus some other half-done features. > But hey, we dropped the Magic Scissors Tool and the performance of GIMP > master is near to unusable! You sound like you have not been in the meeting in Leipzig where we agreed on introducing a playground for UI and interaction experiments, *including* new tools. The scissory tool is simply disabled until somebody comes and ports it to GEGL. The performance of master near to unusable until somebody comes and optimizes it. > As long as the 'Hack first' principle rules, the team will never reach > its own product vision, if anybody remembers that thing :-( What was that again? Remind us. > Sad to see it go that way. Sad to see rants like this, instead of help with improving things. > Disillusioned, Annoyed, Mitch _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
