Re: [Gimp-user] Time to fork BABL and GEGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19 November 2014 23:57, Elle Stone <ellestone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> In case you don't understand this, HDR sRGB data is still *bounded* by the
> sRGB xy chromaticities. It's only unbounded along the Y axis. There are NO
> negative channel values in HDR sRGB data unless the *user* chooses to do
> something odd, in which case the *user* is responsible for fixing the
> results.
>

Doesn't this contradict with the following, from your recent mail? (I don't
know what particularly is the definition of HDR used)

"We've also agreed that for chromaticity independent RGB editing operations
("CI ops", for short), by definition the same colors (as located in the XYZ
reference color space) are obtained regardless of the chromaticities that
are used to encode the data."


-- 
Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list




[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux