On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > Michael Henning did understand and did make appropriate changes to babl's > hard-coded sRGB Y values. But I doubt whether any of the other devs > understood; if they did, babl wouldn't still use D65 device sRGB to convert > to XYZ before converting to LAB, and GIMP wouldn't still be full of > hard-coded D65 device sRGB Y values. See: Elle, assuming that things are not done/fixed, because we don't understand them or don't care about them, is simply incorrect. We have a roadmapful of things we care about which still need someone to work on. It really is that easy. By now, it's been repeated about a dozen of times that we had adjusted our plans in the past to honor your useful input, and we are going to do so in the future __time permitting__. Is there a good reason why there should be another dozen of times for this to be said in the public? As Michael already stated, there are things we simply don't know yet, because they are implementation details. hence we don't have all the answers for you. Please show us some patience. Alex _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
