Re: [Gimp-user] Time to fork BABL and GEGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/17/2014 06:56 PM, Simon Budig wrote:
Oh, I was under the assumption that AdobeRGB had well defined
chromaticies. If that is not the case then please consider my example
moot. I am well aware that dealing with color profiles most definitely
is not my area of expertise.
It absolutely does have well-defined chromaticities.

LCMS specifies an odd value for D65 and doesn't compensate for hexadecimal rounding. And so almost everyone who distributes ICC profiles made with LCMS makes AdobeRGB1998-compatible profiles that don't exactly match the Adobe specifications.

Graham Gill distributes ClayRGB1998.icm that exactly matches the Adobe specs. I've submitted code to GIMP to make a proper AdobeRGB1998-compatible profile.

Other free/libre profile makers really aren't distributing an exact match to the Adobe specs. I've already reported this on the LCMS mailing list.

Similar problems obtain with a lot of other free/libre ICC profiles.

Elle
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list




[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux