Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP should fork babl and GEGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:

>> If you *ask* the user whether they want to have their data treated as
>> "bonified same as GIMP's sRGB" and then use optimized sRGB-only code,
>> that's one thing. Doing so behind the user's back, without their
>> consent, that's another thing. That is disrespecting the user's
>> control over their RGB data.
>
> This is critical.  If I'm working with a wide-gamut profile, I really
> really really don't want gimp screwing with the rgb data without my
> say so.

Frankly, I'm puzzled. It's been, how many? 8 years? since GIMP asks
users what it should do with a picture that is tagged with a profile
that doesn't match the current RGB working space. Has anyone actually
suggested that this is going to be otherwise? :)

Alex
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list




[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux