Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP should fork babl and GEGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/05/2014 09:07 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
Elle Stone (ellestone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Why would any sane developer want to write all the new code and have it
exist side by side with equivalent hard-coded sRGB functions?

Why would any sane developer want to fork an existing libary and have it
exist side by side with an equivalent but subtly incompatible library?

Bye,
         Simon


You are entirely avoiding the very pertinent question I just asked and you full well know it.

Now could you try answering the question I did ask? Although frankly I'd rather hear what Jon Nordby has to say.

Elle
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list




[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux