On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Elle Stone <ellestone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Tying GIMP to "sRGB as PCS" is a dead-end move. >> >> If you take "spectrally based reproduction" as an argument against "sRGB >> as PCS" you should be at least be so fair to also mention that *any* RGB >> based image editing is bound to fail for this. > > In point of fact, I've already said thist. But I'm happy to say it again. > RGB data is not spectral data. As a former researcher at a national color science laboratory, and a major contributor to babl and GEGL; I probably have no idea about these things – and how the spectral data in named color ICCv4 profiles might be used. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKpaXu87Coo /Ø _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
