* Pavel <pavel@xxxxxxxxxx> [05-22-14 07:05]: > Is this the most comprehensive answer you can give me? > > On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 14:57 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > 22 мая 2014 г. 14:28 пользователь "Pavel" <pavel@xxxxxxxxxx> написал: > > > > > (I am testing it on Gimp 2.6, perhaps it has been improved since then?) > > > > Er... Why? > > > > Alexandre > > _______________________________________________ > > gimp-developer-list mailing list > > List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list > > > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list maybe because gimp 2.8 was released on 3 May 2012 ?? Why not test with it? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
