On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:16:00AM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:07 +1300, Jehan Pagès wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Roman Joost <romanofski@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: > > > > > > http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Documentation:Main > > > > > > Any feedback is welcome. Some of the points are not to be read as: go > > > ahead and implement, but rather look into it for it's feasibility. > > > > > > If there are no objections or comments I'd basically call the roadmap > > > silently as accepted. For each point I think it'll be good to create > > > bugs so we can track progress. > > > > I've not read it in details and mostly skimmed through. > > > > I got intrigued by a specific point though: moving the manual to > > github. Really? I'm sorry for the misunderstanding caused by my poor organisation of the wiki page. This is not part of the roadmap, but is part of our list of ideas. As such, I think it is valid to raise and think about; talk about it's pros and cons. But that's all what it is so far - an idea asking if it would bring any benefits. > > I know several (all?) of GNOME's repos have already > > been *mirrored* to github. Personally I find it acceptable if repos > > are just mirrored (that's after all one of the point of git as a > > "distributed" revision control), but not if it is to be considered the > > new main repository of the project. github is just another of these > > platforms led by a company, just like was Sourceforge (and now look, > > with time, all projects are fleeing it, just as we did), and like will > > be some other "fashionable" platform in the future. So I say, we keep > > control of the main repo. And if a github mirror had to be created, > > that would only be to profit of its network effect (why not), but it > > must be soon clear to new contributors that they must sync with the > > GNOME repo in the end, not the github one. > > > > Was that what you were proposing? If so, ok. > > +1 from me. > > Why would you move to github? I agree with everything Jehan said. I've never considered it in such a detail. So well said. I couldn't agree more. I've moved our ideas on to a separate page to make the key points for the next release (3.0) more readable. Cheers for the feeback! -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanofski@xxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
