Jehan wrote: > Actually Mitch, our maintainer proposed something similar (see > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712194). > So we could have a default of IMG_38210-1.jpg for instance. please don’t. there is two reasons that I am against tampering with this: 1) when using Export As... (new label), there are 3 things that can be changed: the location (say, directory), the name, the file type (extension) 2 out of 3 times, the name does not need changing. 2) the same ‘danger’ exists for Save As... but I think we all manage quite well with that one. >> Yes yes, I know that I'm not the target user and I probably will have to end >> up using something like darktable or similar (even if I prefer geeqie for >> browsing, directories for organizing and gimp for editing) but I want to [snip] > So you see! You are the target user! ;-) no that is not what we are doing with this. it does not mean that the non-savers are target users now. what we are doing is a renewed effort to take all the friction out of the non-saving paths for as much as we can (without throwing away the clear separation principle), for the benefit of all users. --ps founder + principal interaction architect man + machine interface works http://blog.mmiworks.net: on interaction architecture _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
