Hi, On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Michael Schumacher <schumaml@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 30.10.2013 23:14, Jehan Pagès wrote: > >> So well now I'm not sure anymore. Though checking the said file, I >> would not say they are "compiled" in, merely listed as filenames >> (which could therefore apply to any other set of icons with the same >> names). Only stock-question-64.png seems kind of compiled as pixel >> data into gimp-core-pixbufs.h. > > Please read that whole Makefile(.am). And run make in that directory and > check the results. Yes I did read the whole Makefile.am, but I don't know how I did not see gimp-stock-pixbufs.h. :-) Indeed all the default icons are compiled as pixels in a header. Well the safer and simpler is to ask this Jimmac. If he is from the GNOME project, as I understand, I guess he would have no problem with double-licensing his work under GPLv3+. Is anyone in contact with him and could ask him to make an official answer (maybe on this mailing list or other public place) about it? Thanks! Jehan > > -- > Regards, > Michael > GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
