On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) <gespertino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > El 01/09/13 17:22, kcleung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx escribió: > >> Okay..... so do you mean that any non-GEGL plugins or filters should >> be treated as not 32-bit compatible and is therefore capable of >> silently clipping data? > > > What Alexandre is saying is that you won't have to worry about it when 2.10 > is out, because that version won't be released until the rest of the legacy > stuff is ported to GEGL. > Due to the lack of manpower, using developers time to address something that > is only relevant during development is a waste of time and efforts. > If you're using 2.9 you should know that you are using a development version > and things aren't ready yet. > You asked and your answers were replied. You have a list of plugins that > aren't ported to GEGL yet, you know the effect, you know how to tell if they > are/aren't ported and you know that the legacy plugins won't stay like that > whenever GIMP 2.10 is released. > Do you still think developers should use their time to code warnings about > it? > Thanks for the clarification........ so if I were to use the trunk and process files that have color channels larger than 8 bits, then I will stick to GEGL plugins :) I will now start looking at the code structure, and the non-GEGL list list to see what I can do...... _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
