On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Michael Natterer <mitch@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
-- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/
> While I am at it.
Please start new threads, or change the topic - when changing the topic.
>
, why does edge-sobel add extra pixels to the original
> image? Is it a 'don't care' thing.
No - for the same reason that gaussian blur adds extra pixels to the original buffer; assuming an abyss behavior of zeroed pixels around the buffer. Both of these filters have well defined results. For a drop-shadow added to a layer you do intend to blur the contents out into nothingness - all such area filters with a dependendant neighbourhood are at the core - at GEGL graph level is concerned, growing their defined inputs.
Just because something is in git doesn't mean it's correct :)
If there is strange behavior, a look at the code, a bug report,
or even a patch are appreciated.
--mitch
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
-- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/
_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
