On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 10:55 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:51:26 -0400 > Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Ideas.... > > > - Does GIMP really need to output pressure curves for an input that > > > is not actually mapped to something? > > > - Does GIMP really need to output a full lookup table if the > > > specified curve type is "smooth" (the apparent default) and GIMP > > > can just re-generate the lookup table when loading the file? > > > - Why does the definition of a default linear curve -- i.e. > > > (0,0)-(1,1) -- need to specify more than two points? > > > - And since it is a default linear curve, does it even need to be > > > specified at all? > > > I think the right answer here is that patches are welcome. > > It's never the right answer. Especially when a question is asked, not > just a rant posted. It is exactly the answer, because the answer to obviously stupid things a program does is most of the time "it is like it is because nobody did anything about it". --mitch _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
