On 29 March 2013 23:01, Sean Munkel <seanmunkel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > After picking this up again I've run into a problem. I'm not really > sure how to get this to replace the current gimp.PDB with its wrapped > version. Am I correct in thinking that the best way to do this is to > rename the gimp.so C library to be _gimp.so and then importing > everything from there in a python file gimp.py and do the wrapping > step in there? It would be the "correct thing to do"- but in the process of doing so, I like to offload as much of the hard-coded C bindings in there to Python itself - as there is some proof of concept in the Summer of Code Python branch. And...doing so, would also imply in having to put tests in place for that stuff - that should definitely come first. js -><- > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Sean Munkel <seanmunkel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>One >> >> way to get around this issue of __doc__ not being display is to >> >> actually create a regular python function for each procedure. Instead >> >> of using gimp.PDB you would have to wrap it in a class that will use >> >> its methods but hook into __getattr__. Inside of __getattr__ it would >> >> create a function that would then be able to have a __doc__ that would >> >> be displayed by help. >> >> >> >> https://gist.github.com/smunkel/5103533 >> > >> > Yes - that would be more or less the way to go - >> > Or that, or make each PDB callable object be in a separate class by >> > itself. >> > >> > Did the code in the link above work for you? (I have not tried it yet) >> > >> It isn't properly dealing with Nones everywhere yet, but for the most part >> its >> working correctly. >> >> --Sean Munkel > > > > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
