> Von: "peter sikking" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > An: "gimp-developer list" <gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx> > Betreff: Re: gimp gradients > > Alexandre wrote: > > > I wrote: > > > >> I must say I am thinking of picking either the gradient or align tool > >> as the module for my students to design. > >> > >> both are simply up for grabs. > > > > That would be great if a spec will come out of it. > > > > *cough* selection tool *cough* > spec writing seems to be a waste of time, competence and enthusiasm > at the moment. developers simply throw away a third of it and do what > they want. this pattern has been growing at GIMP over the last years. My feeling as only occasional contributor is that it is currently hard to determine if a spec is fully implemented or not, and if not, what parts are missing. Some specs, like e.g., Save & Export, seem to be next to complete. Others, like the Unified Transform Tool, are implemented up to a point where any further steps felt like removing existing functionality - and have thus are thus left the tool in an inconsistent state. Would it help if the state of the implementation was tracked in the gui wiki itself, by marking paragraphs and sections as implemented or missing? Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
