--- En date de : Mer 28.11.12, Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM, > Alexia Death <alexiadeath@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > ... sigh... Let me explain this again. > > Yes, we're all shaking our heads. > > (I was bitten by the smarmy 'you're wrong! I know what you > want to do, > but I'll not do it!' dialog several times tonight alone... > nothing > like re-navigating through stacks of directories from > scratch after > the 'Ha ha' message. I laugh along every time.) ... > Blaming the users with a big sigh and eye-roll isn't a > strategy for > long-term success. I tried it for a long time myself, > it's not really > a great plan. > > Monty I [wrongly] thought my post was lost. Let me just add, for the record, that besides what you wrote my post wasn't about trying to re-(describe/define) what the save options/paths/workflow are doing. In my post I was, after recap'ing how many save options we had and what they do (regardless of how I could describe them for *that* part was irrelevant of my... "rant") just trying to stress on the fact that there were too many [save] options. The *sigh* you're referring to was about points which weren't the ones I intended to discuss. (I'm not reacting as if it were a personal attack though, no worry about that.) But that debate shall be closed, I guess. Cheers, Vince C. _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
