On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Graeme Gill wrote: > Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: >> Perhaps you came late to the discussion. Several team members >> including myself already mentioned before that we had observed >> professionals liking the change and not quite understanding what all >> this fuzz is about. You will find it difficult to explain how this was >> a figment of our imagination. Perhaps you could start with studying >> _actual_ response from the "day to day use" world? > > It's tangential to the reason I commented on this list. Perhaps you didn't notice, but that was my reply to a different person. There are more than two people participating in this discussion. > But you can't keep on saying "it's because of data loss" > when this reason doesn't seem to stack up. I don't keep saying that. It's more than just data loss. It's workflow. Seriously, you've been into this discussion long enough. Surely you've already read both http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification and http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Vision_briefing to understand the intentions. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
