The development team size (I'm not among them) is such that they need to do their own thing. They've done a lot of work to reach this decision and think that as their vision is realized it will become recognized as clearly the correct move.
As I see it, you've all got three options: live with it, branch GIMP and do things your own way, or develop an alternative to GIMP.
Last year I spent a few weeks (really! 120+ hours) studying the code, and to say the least, there's a ton of it and it's all complicated.
Good luck with your choices.
Pete
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Egor Voznessenski <voznyak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!
Now, that's exactly a Communist way.
Птн 16 Ноя 2012 20:28:45 от Michael Natterer <mitch@xxxxxxxx>:
> You can all stop wasting your time arguing.
>
> We did this change for a reason, and we will not revert
> it nor will we make the behavior configurable.
>
> I have not read any of the mails on this thread,
> and I will not reply to any response to this mail.
>
> --mitch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
>
-- EV --
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
