On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 11:49 +0200, gg wrote: > "With modern computers" argument is countered by "on modern images". As > the hardware gets faster the images also get bigger ( in both x and y) . > As gimp progresses to higher bit resolutions any difference may become > more relevant not less. I just compared the two methods and found RLE tool about 10 or 11 seconds and IIR took maybe 19 seconds on the same image with the same radius (2.5p I think). Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml Co-author, 5th editoin of "Beginning XML", Wrox, July 2012 _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
