> I used to use it a long time ago. I don't understand why some people say
> it's one of the worst versions of Windows. I always found ME to be at least
> as reliable/stable as the previous version I was using ('98?) if not more
> so. It never gave me any grief.
Then you were a happy case of a perfect hardware vendor
..but for other millions ME was a nightmare - less stable than WIndows
98 second edition
..you should check internet reviews of ME for that period
..not just users but some important magazines in their reviews
declared ME a failure
anyway ME is a thing of the past - for many of us it's a miracle how
often GIMP crashed on mr. Tanaka computer
because GIMP 2.x until 2.7 was very stable under heavy load.
2012/7/25 Kevin Cozens <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 12-07-23 04:22 PM, Michael Henning wrote:
>>
>> I suppose you've never used Windows ME....
>>
>> **shudder**
>> Just typing the name brings back memories.
>
>
> I used to use it a long time ago. I don't understand why some people say
> it's one of the worst versions of Windows. I always found ME to be at least
> as reliable/stable as the previous version I was using ('98?) if not more
> so. It never gave me any grief.
>
> --
> Cheers!
>
> Kevin.
>
> http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract
> Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're
> | powerful!"
> #include <disclaimer/favourite> | --Chris Hardwick
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
--
Nemes Ioan Sorin
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
