Re: gimp 2.8 prohibitively slow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20 July 2012 03:25, Alexandre Prokoudine
<alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, SorinN wrote:
>
>> Anyway, nothing is perfect, at least for you Alexandre - so let's
>> (unnecessary) complicate the topic, if not related to GEGL transition,
>> in a logical consecution next question is - why is slow then ?.
>>
>>>I'd like to know what developers know that :)
>>
>> Now this is the real point over the pretty letter I.
>> Well, you are free to ask them all -  who am I to stop you ?
>> Probably not just developers but all peoples who changed 2.6 for 2.8,
>> but go on, ask developers just to be sure.
>
> Let's try again:
>
> <irony>I'd like to know what developers know that :)</irony>
>
> Meaning: "No developers know that, because your assumption about the
> transition effect is incorrect" :)
>
> The bug is known, the fix isn't trivial, mitch didn't have the time to
> do it for 2.8.

Link to the bugreport please?

> If anyone's willing to have a go at it, please join IRC to discuss it.




-- 
Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux