On 06/17/12 00:32, peter sikking wrote:
yes.
because it is not fruitful to have a line-by-line refuting match.
I was not expect or seeking a refuting match, I made constructive
suggestion.
I was naively expecting it to be considered and possibly discussed. Not
refuted or ignored. Or attract insults.
instead, I showed where the real meat of the argument is.
the ‘match’ is played in a completely different ballpark than
where you wanted to kick around a bit with this topic. sorry.
this is the best I could do to keep things constructive here.
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works
So you seem to be saying this is not the place to discuss the way gimp
UI is being developed. Refuting matches are held elsewhere. Sorry,
private party.
May as well shut down the list. then.
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
